By Tom Kando
We learned
from the news recently that in 2013 the
richest 85 individuals in the world have as much wealth as the poorest
half of mankind combined. This is so
interesting that even Fox News reported
it, even though they usually hate to talk about inequality, accusing anyone who does of envy and class warfare. (See the
Forbes article: http://www.forbes.com/billionaires)
Factoids:
! There
are now 1,426 billionaires in the world.
Together their worth is $5.4 trillion. That’s
roughly
one third of the US GDP. This amount is
up from $4.6 trillion a year earlier, i.e. up 17%. There are 210 new
billionaires.
! 442
of the 1,426 billionaires (=31%) are in
the US, 386 are in the Asia-Pacific region, 366
in
Europe, 129 in the Americas and 103 in the Middle East and Africa.
! I
totaled the wealth of the top 85 billionaires and came up with
$1.73 trillion. This is the
same
amount as the total wealth of the bottom
3.5 billion people on earth. In other
words, the 85
super-rich
are worth $20.3 billion per person,
whereas the bottom 3.6 billion people in
the world
are
worth $4,700 per individual. Or put another way, each of the super-rich is
worth as much as
FOUR
AND A HALF MILLION people in the world’s bottom half, a population larger than that
of
many countries.
! ! Here
are some of the better known celebrities on the list:
Rank
|
Name
|
Business
|
fortune
|
country
|
#
1
|
Carlos
Slim Helu
|
Telecom
|
73
billion
|
Mexico
|
#
2
|
Bill
Gates
|
Microsoft
|
67
billion
|
US
|
#
4
|
Warren
Buffett
|
Misc.
|
53.5
billion
|
US
|
#6, 6, 329
|
Koch
brothers
|
Misc.
|
72
billion
|
US
|
#9
|
Liliane
Bettencourt
|
L’Oreal
|
30
billion
|
France
|
#11,14,1617,346
|
Walton
family
|
Wal-Mart
|
111.3
billion
|
US
|
#
13
|
Michael
Bloomberg
|
Misc.
|
27
billion
|
US
|
#15
|
Sheldon
Adelson
|
Casinoa
|
26.5
billion
|
US
|
#23
|
Michele
Ferrero
|
Chocolates
|
20.4
billion
|
Italy
|
#
26
|
Carl
Icahn
|
Leveraged
buyouts
|
20
billion
|
US
|
#
30
|
George
Soros
|
Hedge
Funds
|
19.2
billion
|
US/
Hungary
|
# 36,37,38
|
Mars
family
|
Mars
candy
|
51
billion
|
US
|
#
66
|
Mark
Zuckerberg
(29
years old)
|
Facebook
|
13.3
billion
|
US
|
#
94
|
Charlene
Heineken
|
Heineken
beer
|
11
billion
|
Holland
|
#
131
|
Georgio
Armani
|
Fashion
|
8.5
billion
|
Italy
|
#
166
|
Ralph
Lauren
|
Fashion
|
7
billion
|
US
|
#
346
|
George
Lucas
|
Star
Wars
|
3.9
billion
|
US
|
#
423
|
Donald
Trump
|
Real
Estate
|
3.2
billion
|
US
|
#
1,175
|
Bruce
Nordstrom
|
Nordstrom
|
1.2
billion
|
US
|
Number of top 85 Billionaires by Countries:
Countries
|
Number
of billionaires
|
US
|
32
|
Russia
|
10
|
Germany
|
6
|
France
|
5
|
Hong
Kong
|
4
|
Mexico,
Brazil
|
3
each
|
Italy,
India, Colombia, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia
|
2
each
|
Spain,
Sweden, India,Canada, Chile, Thailand, Australia, Nigeria, Ukraine, Japan,
Philippines, South Korea
|
1
each
|
total
|
85
|
! Sources
of wealth: The usual suspects:
Many: Electronics, Amazon, Google, Dell, Microsoft,
Facebook, Samsung, Telecom, etc.
Many:
Oil, gas, cement, petrochemicals, mining, steel, coal, metals.
Many
: Banking, hedge funds, leveraged buyouts, etc
Many:
Real Estate
Some:
Chain stores (Wal-Mart, Aldi, Trader Joe,)
Some:
Fashion, cosmetics (Prada, L’Oreal)
Some:
Beverages, candy, chocolate.
! Gender: 10 women, 75 men.
! In 2013, Amancio Ortega, Spain, gained
$19.5 billion and moved up to third
position.
Warren
Buffett gained $9.5 billion, yet dropped to #4. The biggest loser was the Brazilian Eike Batista, who lost $19.4
billion in one year, = $50 million per day, and thus fell from #7 to
#100. Not included in Forbes’ list are Royal families and dictators.
Conclusions:
Of
course, I have to insert a few socialist
comments:
! The US’ 442 billionaires make up 31% of
the total, and we only make up 4% of the
world’s
population. But this is no cause for joy. The US is also experiencing the
greatest polarization of income of ANY developed country. Furthermore, contrary
to the stereotype (“the American Dream,” “the land of opportunity,” etc.)
upward mobility is more limited in the US than
in Europe. In other words, there is more poverty and there are fewer
opportunities here than elsewhere. I doubt that THIS is the sort of “exception”
flag waving Republicans have in mind when they harp on that tired old theme
- “American exceptionalism.”
! And another thing: most people learn
exactly the wrong lesson from data such as these.
Many
folks come to the idiotic conclusion that such information shows us the
individual characteristics it takes to become successful. Hard work, talent,
dedication, etc.
In other words, most people believe
that these 85 top billionaires, and the other 1,341 too, are somehow BETTER than the rest of us - more
talented, with more work ethic, more genius of one sort or another...
Hogwash. The list teaches us nothing
at the individual level. Were you to meet these people, you would see
that they are not smarter, funnier, better looking, more intelligent, more
talented, or more anything than your average neighbor. They have more of only
one thing: Money.
Individual characteristics don’t
explain who becomes a billionaire. Only one thing explains who becomes a
billionaire: ADVANTAGE.
And where does advantage come from?
CIRCUMSTANCE. In other words: your location in time and (social) space. Put another way: LUCK.
If you happen to be born in Africa
or in the South Bronx, or in the middle of
World War Two, bad luck for you. If you are born the son of the
President of American Motors, or the governor of Michigan, you luck out. Is it
a coincidence that only ONE of the top 85 billionaires is from Africa?
This is called Sociology, folks. And
it’s correct. Get used to it. We are all billiard balls. We are volleys of
molecules shot into space, or
swarms of mosquitoes. A few end
up on top, a few at the bottom, some on
the far left, some on the far right, and most somewhere in the middle.
It’s all about probabilities, randomness, the normal distribution, (the “bell
curve”), regression towards the mean. Individual characteristics have very
little to do with success or failure. Sorry.
© Tom Kando 2014leave comment here
