Introduction:
The Social Progress Imperative
Once again, I am writing about one of those international rankings, focusing on the US= comparative position, and adding comments which no doubt will aggravate some of you.
The ASocial
Progress Imperative@
is a British outfit that ranks
132 of the world=s
countries on a composite index measuring Asocial progress.@
http://www.socialprogressimperative.org
http://www.socialprogressimperative.org
The factors are grouped into
three broad categories: Basic Human Needs, Foundations of Well-being and
Opportunity. They include such items as basic medical care and personal safety,
health, wellness and ecosystem sustainability, and personal rights, tolerance and inclusion. In sum, countries are ranked in terms of Ahow good@ they are
overall, how well off their people are in all aspects of their lives.
Obviously, a country=s rank will vary from one indicator to
another. For example, the US ranks as the best country in the world in terms of access to advanced education,
but a dismal #70 in health and wellness (below Mali, which ranks #69).
The Twenty Best Countries in the world
Today, space limits me to dealing with overall rankings only. The table below lists the top 20 countries of the world:
The 20 best countries in the world
|
||
rank
|
country
|
population
|
1
|
New Zealand
|
4.5 million
|
2
|
Switzerland
|
8.1 million
|
3
|
Iceland
|
326,000
|
4
|
Netherlands
|
16.8 million
|
5
|
Norway
|
5.1 million
|
6
|
Sweden
|
9.7 million
|
7
|
Canada
|
35.3 million
|
8
|
Finland
|
5.5 million
|
9
|
Denmark
|
5.6 million
|
10
|
Australia
|
23.5 million
|
11
|
Austria
|
8.5 million
|
12
|
Germany
|
80.7 million
|
13
|
United Kingdom
|
63.7 million
|
14
|
Japan
|
127.1 million
|
15
|
Ireland
|
4.6 million
|
16
|
United States
|
321.5 million
|
17
|
Belgium
|
11.2 million
|
18
|
Slovenia
|
2.1 million
|
19
|
Estonia
|
1.3 million
|
20
|
France
|
65.9 million
|
The next table lists ten more countries that are of special interest to me:
25
|
Costa Rica
|
best country in Latin America
|
29
|
Italy
|
|
32
|
Hungary
|
my country of birth
|
39
|
Israel
|
|
54
|
Mexico
|
|
57
|
Botswana
|
best country in Africa
|
80
|
Russia
|
|
90
|
China
|
|
102
|
India
|
|
132
|
Chad
|
worst country in the world
|
Comparing the US to Some of the ABetter@ Countries is not Entirely Fair
Many of the Acountries that are Abetter@ than the US should not even be on this competitive list:
Switzerland
has been competing unfairly for over a century. It has been enriching itself at
the expense of the world by providing a secretive banking haven for criminal
billionaire tax evaders in the US, Europe, the Middle East, Russia and other places.
Several small
northern European countries have benefitted from the North Sea natural gas
bonanza of the past 50 years, becoming - temporarily - very affluent. For
example Norway (whose population is smaller than that of greater
Boston).
Consider most of
these countries=
population size: For such a ranking, should Iceland even count as a
country? Its population is smaller than that of Riverside, CA.
Other countries
on this list with populations the size
of US cities include: Estonia (= Greater Memphis), Slovenia
(= Metro Sacramento), New Zealand (= Greater Seattle), Ireland (= Metro San
Francisco), Finland and Denmark (= Greater Atlanta)
Comparing the
US to Some of the ABetter@ Countries IS Fair
This leaves eleven countries which must be taken more seriously, if you get my drift: The Netherlands, Sweden, Canada, Australia, Austria, Germany, the United Kingdom, Japan, the United States, Belgium and France. Of these, eight rank higher than the US. Many of these are relatively large. Area-wise, Canada is larger than the US, and Australia is nearly as large. The populations of Japan, Germany and the United Kingdom are quite large, and their combined GDPs nearly equal ours. The Netherlands, with a population of 17 million people, has the 17th largest GDP in the world, nearly half that of Russia, in whose territory you can fit the Netherlands 410 times (!).
In other words, these are
substantial countries and they are extremely successful. They must be doing something right. The US
might learn something from them. The next table shows America=s strengths and weaknesses.
How does the US rank on the various
factors?
|
||
Factor
|
rank
|
comment
|
Access
to advanced education
|
1
|
Very
good
|
Opportunity
|
5
|
Okay
|
Shelter
|
9
|
Okay
|
Tolerance
and inclusion
|
13
|
Okay
|
Freedom
and choice
|
15
|
Okay
|
Overall
|
16
|
Okay
|
Personal
rights
|
22
|
So
so
|
Basic
Human Needs
|
23
|
So
so
|
Access
to communication and information
|
23
|
So
so
|
Nutrition
and Basic Medical Care
|
24
|
So
so
|
Personal
Safety
|
31
|
Not
so good
|
Water
and Sanitation
|
34
|
Not
so good
|
Foundations
of Well being:
|
36
|
Not
so good
|
Access
to basic knowledge
|
39
|
Not
so good
|
Ecosystem
sustainability
|
69
|
Very
bad
|
Health
and wellness
|
70
|
Very
bad
|
In Conclusion
As you can see, America is a work in progress.
Right
now, Americans are not happy campers. Many people both on the Left and on the
Right feel that the country is in decline.
I wish I could report trends
found in the
http://www.socialprogressimperative.org
index. How do we stack up now vs. 30 yrs. ago? There
was a time when America was supposed to be ANumber One.@ Have we slipped? Have others (Japan, China, the Asian
Tigers, the BRIC, Scandinavia) come up in relative rankings? Alas, the
http://www.socialprogressimperative.org
does not
provide longitudinal information, so I
can only comment on 2014.
I have heard it said that the country is returning to the Gilded Age and the era of robber barons. True, American inequality and poverty have been rising. Unions now make up 11% of the labor force, down from 35% half a century ago. Republican obstructionism has produced gridlock in Washington. A conservative Supreme Court and House of Representatives have stood in the way of progress and moved the country to the right. Pollsters predict that voters this year will deliver the Senate to the GOP as well. When I scroll through thousands of Internet comments posted to the latest news article on Yahoo, Internet Explorer, AOL and other browsers, I notice innumerable sordid, racist, xenophobic, right-wing diatribes and I wonder whether this is the true pulse of the country.
Yes,
there are many mis-guided people who wish to turn the clock back, who want to
dismantle the safety net, who oppose minimum wage laws and collective
bargaining, who want to reduce or
eliminate unemployment compensation and food stamps, who oppose funding for public
education, for public works and for infrastructure, especially visionary projects such as
bullet trains. Most perversely,
they want the Affordable Care Act to fail.
Yes,
70% of Americans are struggling with a
declining standard of living and a deteriorating quality of life. 27% of us are holding our
own, because we picked up benefits and built our safety net decades ago. 3% are
becoming obscenely rich.
But the
verdict isn=t in. Back during the Great Depression, Americans came to
see that they would benefit from the re-invigoration of the public sector,
human services, great projects, public assistance to the needy, a great
collective effort to turn the country around, with the key leadership role
being played by the only institution that can ever turn any
country around: its government.
© Tom Kando 2014
The top 15 countries are either cold and wet or they limit your ability to own a gun…other than Australia and NZ, I wouldn't want to live in any of them. I prefer the Warm Social Progress Index, in which case we’re second in the world just behind Australia.
ReplyDeleteApril 18, 2014
Being silly is okay. I like silliness, too, sometimes.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous is right about the weather. In an earlier post, I reviewed a similar ranking, one in which Finland was ranked number one. I asked rhetorically how many of us would want to live in a frigid place where the night lasts 6 months (Scandinavia is reported to have high rates of suicide and alcoholism).
As to guns? Guns are bad and stupid, as are the fixation on them and most of the arguments about them...
Australia (which I have visited extensively, and which is indeed a wonderful country) is not known to have exceptionally permissive gun laws...
April 18, 2014
I enjoyed your perceptive analysis of that international survey.
ReplyDelete(originally April 19, 2014)
US access to advanced education....access...maybe yes...advanced education.... If advanced is linked to lowest...sure...
ReplyDeleteI do not think that anybody was ever impressed by the level of the scholarship in US...
Enjoying a nice weekend, people here are very nice. They do not pretend to have the exclusivity of being nice:)
Sent from my iPad
April 20, 2014
Anonymous' comment is not very good.
ReplyDeleteActually, many people ARE impressed by the still unequaled level of US research and scholarship.
These include the Nobel Committee, which has awarded nearly as many Nobel Prizes to the US as to the rest of the world combined, and the dozens of thousands of doctoral candidates, researchers and (aspiring) scientists who move to American universities every year from India, China, Europe and the rest of the world - the well-known brain drain.
April 20, 2014
nfortunately these types rankings often lead to bad political actions: they tend to be used to increase corruption: e.g.; someone gets an agency, a research grant, or other funding at taxpayer expense. If you eliminated all forms of corruption from the US political system we might be better off than passing more laws to "solve" the problems these types of rankings tend to reveal. Laws should uniformly apply to everyone and when they discriminate in one way or another you end up with some form of corruption.
ReplyDelete(originally: April 21, 2014)